Strategic Interactions between an Independent Central Bank and a Myopic Government with Government Debt /

We analyse optimal discretionary games between a benevolent central bank and a myopic government in a New Keynesian model. First, when lump-sum taxes are available and public debt is absent, we show that a Nash game results in too much government spending and excessively high interest rates, while f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stehn, Sven Jari
Other Authors: Vines, David
Format: Journal
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2008.
Series:IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 2008/164
Online Access:Full text available on IMF
LEADER 02078cas a2200253 a 4500
001 AALejournalIMF005177
008 230101c9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
020 |c 5.00 USD 
020 |z 9781451870220 
022 |a 1018-5941 
040 |a BD-DhAAL  |c BD-DhAAL 
100 1 |a Stehn, Sven Jari. 
245 1 0 |a Strategic Interactions between an Independent Central Bank and a Myopic Government with Government Debt /  |c Sven Jari Stehn, David Vines. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b International Monetary Fund,  |c 2008. 
300 |a 1 online resource (38 pages) 
490 1 |a IMF Working Papers 
500 |a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
500 |a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required 
506 |a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students 
520 3 |a We analyse optimal discretionary games between a benevolent central bank and a myopic government in a New Keynesian model. First, when lump-sum taxes are available and public debt is absent, we show that a Nash game results in too much government spending and excessively high interest rates, while fiscal leadership reinstates the cooperative outcome under discretion. Second, we show that this familiar result breaks down when lump-sum taxes are unavailable. With government debt, the Nash equilibrium still entails too much public spending but leads to lower interest rates than the cooperative policy, because debt has to be adjusted back to its pre-shock level to ensure time consistency. A setup of fiscal leadership does not avoid this socially costly outcome. Imposing a debt penalty onto the myopic government under either Nash or fiscal leadership raises welfare substantially, while appointing a conservative central bank is less effective. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet 
700 1 |a Vines, David. 
830 0 |a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;  |v No. 2008/164 
856 4 0 |z Full text available on IMF  |u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2008/164/001.2008.issue-164-en.xml  |z IMF e-Library