Tax provisions favoring corporate debt over equity finance ('debt bias') are widely recognized as a risk to financial stability. This paper explores whether and how thin-capitalization rules, which restrict interest deductibility beyond a certain amount, affect corporate debt ratios and mi...
|a Washington, D.C. :
|b International Monetary Fund,
|c 2017.
300
|a 1 online resource (20 pages)
490
1
|a IMF Working Papers
500
|a <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
500
|a <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required
506
|a Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students
520
3
|a Tax provisions favoring corporate debt over equity finance ('debt bias') are widely recognized as a risk to financial stability. This paper explores whether and how thin-capitalization rules, which restrict interest deductibility beyond a certain amount, affect corporate debt ratios and mitigate financial stability risk. We find that rules targeted at related party borrowing (the majority of today's rules) have no significant impact on debt bias-which relates to third-party borrowing. Also, these rules have no effect on broader indicators of firm financial distress. Rules applying to all debt, in contrast, turn out to be effective: the presence of such a rule reduces the debt-asset ratio in an average company by 5 percentage points; and they reduce the probability for a firm to be in financial distress by 5 percent. Debt ratios are found to be more responsive to thin capitalization rules in industries characterized by a high share of tangible assets.
538
|a Mode of access: Internet
700
1
|a Hebous, Shafik.
830
0
|a IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;
|v No. 2017/022
856
4
0
|z Full text available on IMF
|u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2017/022/001.2017.issue-022-en.xml
|z IMF e-Library