Once Again, is Openness Good for Growth?
Rodriguez and Rodrik (2000) argue that the relation between openness and growth is still an open question. One of the main problems in the assessment of the effect is the endogeneity of the relation. In order to address this issue, this paper applies the identification through heteroskedasticity met...
| 企业作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 杂志 |
| 语言: | English |
| 出版: |
Washington, D.C. :
International Monetary Fund,
2004.
|
| 丛编: | IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;
No. 2004/135 |
| 在线阅读: | Full text available on IMF |
| 总结: | Rodriguez and Rodrik (2000) argue that the relation between openness and growth is still an open question. One of the main problems in the assessment of the effect is the endogeneity of the relation. In order to address this issue, this paper applies the identification through heteroskedasticity methodology to estimate the effect of openness on growth while properly controlling for the effect of growth on openness. The results suggest that openness would have a positive effect on growth, although small. This result stands, despite the equally robust effect from growth to openness. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | <strong>Off-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required <strong>On-Campus Access:</strong> No User ID or Password Required |
| 实物描述: | 1 online resource (29 pages) |
| 格式: | Mode of access: Internet |
| ISSN: | 1018-5941 |
| 访问: | Electronic access restricted to authorized BRAC University faculty, staff and students |